Categorized | Reviews, Theatrical Reviews

[Jack's Review] Transformers: Revenge of The Fallen

TransformersREVIEW

By Jack Giroux

Editor’s Note: This review does contain spoilers.

Transformers: Revenge of The Fallen is an underwhelming follow up to a highly entertaining blockbuster. This sequel does contain “explosive action”, but it comes too scarce and is almost incomprehensible. It is incredibly dumb, bloated, and runs far too long for an action film with no brain. This is, without a doubt, one of the biggest disappointments of the summer.

After fighting in a war Sam Witwicky is trying his best to live a normal life while going off to college. After discovering the last remaining piece of the all spark he starts seeing symbols leading to the truth about the Transformers ancient origins. Sam is taken away from his failed attempt at a normal when it becomes known that the fallen Decepticons are soon ready to rage war. They soon attempt on taking him prisoner to bring total destruction upon earth. With the help of Optimus Prime and the other Autobots, Sam must once again fight his way to saving mankind.

Check out the rest of the review below

The story is beyond messy due to the incoherent script. The film continually strays away from any sort of cohesion and moves from set piece to set piece as slowly as possible. At first, it’s Sam dealing with a part of the all-spark, then it’s Sam almost being taken prisoner, and then it ends with Sam searching for an item called “The Matrix of Leadership”- which of course drew a lot of laughs due to the title. The script introduces sub-plot after sub-plot that add nothing to the story. Speaking of useless subplot, there’s an interesting idea about transformers disguising themselves as humans or replicating human life and it’s wasted. There’s also far too many side characters popping in and out of the film. Most notably Josh Duhamel and Tyrese Gibson who have practically nothing to do here except to yell and blow stuff up. The script (of course) keeps most of the characters at a one-dimensional note.

Most of the acting is what you would expect which means most of the actors just scream and run around a lot. Returning as Sam Witwicky is Shia LaBeouf who still remains likable. Despite playing a standard action hero, LaBeouf is a character that one can cheer for even though his heroics are not very believable. He’s a good leading man that’s genuinely funny and likable. Back again playing his girlfriend is Megan Fox and she delivers the same performance as she did in the first film. She isn’t really given anything to do which leads her to coming off as rather bland, but she still remains as enjoyable eye candy. Fox mostly just has to yell and look frightened which doesn’t make for an engaging character. 

Returning to the helm is the explosion expert Michael Bay who delivers everything you would expect him to. The biggest problem with Bay’s direction is his pacing issues. The first hour or so isn’t at total bore, but it also isn’t very entertaining. The first act of the film is slightly more coherent and less repetitive, despite a few comedic tangents. The film divulges into a sluggish pace after an exciting forrest fight sequence. The third act becomes full on action that’s already been seen before, it’s unrelenting and anti-climatic. A movie with such a weak story that revolves around fighting robots does not call for a two and a half hour running time. Long running times are perfectly fine when the story calls for it, but a film with almost no story does not need to be this long. Bay also provides plenty of unintentional laughs due to his hilarious over use of slow motion. The laughable slo-mo shows up most notably during the some drama and the action which makes the film to cross the line of self-parody. These scenes deliver more laughs then the unfunny intentional jokes, for example a robot humping Megan Fox and Sam’s mom eating pot brownies.

On the upside a few of Bay’s action scenes are fun and are shot with a broader sense of geography. Instead of going with constant jump cuts as he did with the first film, Bay conveys a few action scenes with more tracking-shots and wide lenses. This strong point is present earlier on, but then gets lost in the second half of the film. One issue that’s present is that many of the robots are too difficult to tell apart especially during the frantic final battle. It’s incomprehensible action which is the opposite of “fun” action. There’s far too many close ups and far too many jump cuts in the climatic battle. 

There are a few impressive action scenes and Shia still makes for a good leading man, but it still doesn’t work even on the level of “dumb fun”. The pacing and story is all over the place to a point where it detracts from the action. On a technical level the film is stunning, but that’s not enough. Its over stuffed with stupidity, half of the action you’re unable to follow, and it simply just doesn’t have the charm that first film had. The first installment, while not a great film by any means, had a more Spielberg tone with that sense of wonderment and discovery. This installment has traded all that in for repetitiveness, highly unfunny jokes, self parody, and dull pacing. This isn’t summer fun.

4 out of 10

What did you think of Transformers: Revenge of The Fallen?

Related Posts with Thumbnails

  Share          
Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Commenting Rules: Please keep the conversation civil and on topic. The commenting section is for debate, but please refrain from turning civil arguments into personal attacks. If your comment does not add to the debate in a constructive manner, it will be removed. Feel free to speak your mind, but do so with intelligence and respect. Insulting the author, The Film Stage, or other commenters will result in comment removal and possible ban. If you want to point out a typo, correction, suggestion or criticism for The Film Stage, please use the GetSatisfaction Feedback tab on the right side of the page or email us instead. If you would like to have your own Avatar show up with your comment, sign-up for a free Disqus account.

  • Mike
    That's a real weapon, not a laser beam. It's called a Rail gun and it fires using a tube of magnets which it propels a projectile through. Each magnet in the tube pushes the projectile away increasing the speed of it. John Turturro went up there to give them the coordinates of Devestator, however he apparently received those coordinates by eyeballing the horizon because he didn't have any type of GPS or anything to obtain the coordinates, once he got close enough he just knew. Also Sam's parents were kidnapped early on in Paris it's not surprising that you didn't remember though, literally an hour and a half passed with no word of them, I actually forgot until they resurfaced later on.

    Pretty god review though, I enjoyed the film but I wish Michael Bay would co-direct films with someone who knew how to tell a story.

    -MIKE
  • Jack Giroux
    Wait what?!?? Why did he go up there next to him though? Ugh, you know I was already tired by the last 30 minutes so I may have missed that part- kind of like the part where Sam's parents get kidnapped for some reason and wind up in Egypt.
  • Joe
    Totally agree, but they do show what happens with John Turturro and Devastator. John calls in the navy to blast the devastator with the special high intensity laser beam.
blog comments powered by Disqus



Archives



FaceBook Digg Twitter Stumbleupon Feed