Categorized |

Why Watchmen Is Doomed To Disappoint

watchmen1

By Dan Mecca

I don’t know about you, but I’ve been watching these clips Warner Bros. have been putting out, and the whole thing’s just not registering with me. Having read the graphic novel (very recently), I am still reeling from the effects caused by what Alan Moore and Dave Gibbons offer the reader throughout the entire narrative, up to and most definitely including the brilliant finale. By book’s end, there is so much to consider and think about; so much to discuss with your friends.

And why? Because the picture the novel paints, literally (and psychologically), is so vivid and real that it forces the reader to take Watchmen seriously.

Watching these clips, the sense of realism and core message feel lost, or at the very least extremely hollow in comparison. Just a couple of aesthetic questions:

-Why does Rorscach have the Batman growl?

-Why does the Nite Owl’s costume look badass? Did Snyder not remember how raggedy and goofy his costume was in the novel?

-Will Snyder use slow motion in EVERY scene in the film?

The only clip of the four released that really worked for me was the “Rescue” clip, which felt a lot like the novel and recalled much of Gibbons’ original artwork.

Continuing on the plus side of things, I like that they have Matthew Goode playing Ozymandias (a.k.a Adrian Veidt) as a full blown Aryan specimen of beauty and power – essentially the prime example of Hitler’s “superman.” Thinking back to the graphic novel and all of its allusion to the human form and war and the like, it seems like Veidt will be played as the earmark problem/solution, at least on the human scale. So that’s interesting. I cannot wait to witness his monologue at film’s end explaining himself – I think one of the best written parts of the entire novel.

The biggest problem with Watchmen (the film) is the marketing campaign, which most cost nearly as much as the actual film production. This thing is being built up to astronomical proportions, including a July theatrical release of Zack Snyder’s director’s cut.

I mean I swear, if I see “From the visionary director of 300” one more time, I might flip shit. I have got a certain amount of faith in Zack Snyder, but he has yet to prove himself as visionary. I’ve actually got a lot more faith in the casting director Kristy Carlson, citing her mostly pinpoint slection of relatively unknown actors to play the parts (although I’ve got a little problem with the attractive  Patrick Wilson as Dreiberg – kind of the same problem I have with the Nite Owl costume now that I’m thinking about it).

At the end of the day, there’s is no doubt in my mind that Watchmen will be at least as good as 300, and certainly as stylish. But, dear God, I hope it’s better than 300, which resonates to me, upon second viewings, more as a drippy painting with a couple of great action sequences and a whole lotta horrible dialogue than a “visionary” accomplishment.

Unfortunately, I do believe Watchmen just may harbor many of the problems 300 had, most directly style over substance. It appears that Snyder and co. are aware of how BIG Watchmen is and are determined to make epic in size, scope and scale. That being said, the best parts of the graphic novel are the subtleties within the BIG message it presents. (SPOILER ALERT IF YOU HAVE NOT READ WATCHMEN) The idea that the inherent violence and selfishness of human nature can never be completely scrubbed out, never remedied, is offered in the final panel of the novel, not to mention the revelation that Rorscach’s journal will be discovered by the seedy journalist’s and possibly exploited.

The alternate history is used to suggest a fickle American people, easily led astray with enough propaganda and spilled blood, a parallel to our time period which SHOULD make this film more than just entertaining, but important as well.

If Snyder has chosen to make Watchmen visually epic at the sacrifice of narrative depth, it will be apparent early on and potentially destroy what at first looked to be a flawless adaptation.

There’s a lot going against Watchmen as the release date draws nearer and nearer. When first writing this, I was going to warn reader not to watch the released clips with fear they would disappoint. But now, as I come to the end, I feel as though you, reader, should probably watch the clips and bask in their overall mediocrity. Perhaps this will bring down the expectation level, and when the film actually comes out it will be just as great as you think it will, because by that time maybe you will think it will just be very good.

Or wait and don’t watch them, and keep the faith. A lot of people liked 300 a lot more than I did. Either way – God speed.

What do you think? Will Watchmen be an overall disappointment? How do you feel about the casting? The slow motion use?

Related Posts with Thumbnails

  Share          
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Commenting Rules: Please keep the conversation civil and on topic. The commenting section is for debate, but please refrain from turning civil arguments into personal attacks. If your comment does not add to the debate in a constructive manner, it will be removed. Feel free to speak your mind, but do so with intelligence and respect. Insulting the author, The Film Stage, or other commenters will result in comment removal and possible ban. If you want to point out a typo, correction, suggestion or criticism for The Film Stage, please use the GetSatisfaction Feedback tab on the right side of the page or email us instead. If you would like to have your own Avatar show up with your comment, sign-up for a free Disqus account.

  • Nite Owl III
    A little off on this one I guess. Fantastic movie and a huge success. Prediction FAIL!
  • It wasn't a huge success and it wasn't fantastic.
  • Saw an advance screening and I agree with you 100%
  • Here's a very different perspective on why Watchmen is doomed to disappoint...

    http://www.alwayswatching.net/features/why-watchmen-is-doomed-to-disappoint
  • anon
    Rorschach has the batman growl because he's supposed to!! Read the graphic novel again. Look at all his speech bubbles, they're all in wiggly lines. Its to suggest that he has a growly voice.
  • Stu
    Alan Moore reads Watchmen as Rorschach:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1FS60iN0g2I
    So the voice in the movie isn't that bad.
  • andrew
    when i first heard snyder was doing this, i was kinda worried that his film style would not mesh with the material. it is a subtle piece with an intricate story and character development and his past work doesn't reflect this style. i originally didn't think he could pull it off.

    however, i believe that snyder understands the material more than we give him credit for. yeah they are showing typical snyder stylization and material in the promotions but i think he is saving all the stuff that us fans want to see for when the movie comes out. i think they are releasing these stylized clips to draw in the moviegoers unfamiliar with the material. from other reports from NYCC and such it seems the more intricate parts are there such as the watchmaker issue, which i hear is suppose to be in the movie in its entirety. so we'll have to wait and see. also wouldn't it be funny if snyder wanted to release the weakest parts of the movie so that us fans would bitch, and then when we see the movie he surprises us with the depth and subtlety of the adaptation?

    i agree with some points of the article. nite owl being a badass like batman rather than being more like blue beetle or other tech based character. also i really don't like the references to the adaptation being sexy. when was the original material sexy? i never got that feeling at all from the story. from the trailers, i have a feeling they stretched out the dan/laurie love scene on archie to include some t&a which i think is unnecessary. oh well.
  • BigF
    Thats true Jfreezy about the voice of Rorscach. Even the author Alan Moore read the part of Rorscach with the same kind of growl. The video is some where on youtube.
  • JFreezy
    I have read the novel several times and I agree with Django when he says he discovered something new everytime. I'm totally looking forward to seeing this. On the slow motion issue, I welcome it. Too much can be annoying, but I mostly think it helps the viewer get into the movie. In real life we hardly ever get to slow things down and take a better look at what we are seeing. When there is an awesome action sequence happening, I would rather be able to enjoy it at a slower rate than have it zip by in 2 seconds. If you don't like it, don't see it. Simple solution. I also agree with Big F. How can you completely judge a 2+ hour movie on 9 minutes of video clip? Of course they will mostly be slow motion. You want to grab the attention of the viewer, not flash 50 things in front of them and hope they see something they like! It's called smart marketing. You are entitled to your opinion Dan, but I think your opinion is wrong. Also, how else would you interpret the squiggly lettering of Rorscach's speech in the novel? Do you think it as pre-pubescent voice cracking? Me neither.
  • DJiLLPAPA
    Here's what people should remember - what makes WATCHMEN the graphic novel great is that it made the most of the medium. It was written, drawn – created – specifically for that medium. WATCHMEN is the penultimate comic book.

    Now, WATCHMEN the movie is an adaptation. It should be understood as FACT that it's never going to live up to the original material. And all we can hope for is that it at least lives up to itself–an adaptation of a well-loved and well-respected comic. Don't expect a panel-for-panel, word-for-word recreation. Snyder and his team certainly took some liberties, probably because it would just be cool and awesome to see on the big screen. And I should hope so. Because this is an entirely different medium. Really, the best we can hope for is that the ADAPTATION remains true to the spirit of its SOURCE MATERIAL. And that we are entertained and get our money's worth at the box office. I'll definitely be watching...
  • Larry
    Wow, you come off very informed...

    NAHT
  • Halo
    Can we please stop calling the comic a novel? There's nothing wrong with a comic book. Stop pandering to the masses who think comic books are exclusively for children.
  • Django
    Quit the whining and tell everyone to see the movie or read the novel, or do both.

    My experience is, new readers of the novel can't wait to see the movie.

    If all accounts are that any fan of the novel will love the movie, then problem solved.

    If you loved the novel, then tell your friends the movie's sure to be:

    a) EPIC.
    b) INTRIGUING (Revisionist history w/ Nixon still in power? Even non superhero fans have to be intrigued...)
    c) SEXY (Yes. It is. Even sexier than 300, from the looks of it. Abs and all- and w/ some actual sex in it, to boot!)
    d) ALL THE RAGE.

    (There is no doubt about it. At this point I know very few people, save older & younger family members, who haven't heard of this movie. Tell your friends to climb on board!)

    Will it inspire Dark Knight-esque multiple viewings? That remains to be seen.

    But I do know I've read and re-read the novel several, several times & always discovered something new.

    That can't be a bad sign.
  • Big F
    I understand what you're saying, but there are about nine clips online, which total to about 9 mins and 24 secs. I believe the actual movie will be about 2hrs and 35mins. Isn't it a bit premature to make an assumption on the movie.

    Why do ppl hate slow motion honestly? its mostly done for ppl who love that kind of action. As long as the movie delivers in dialouge and direction thats fine by me.
blog comments powered by Disqus



Archives



FaceBook Digg Twitter Stumbleupon Feed